In your decision relating to PPACA you make the case that the government cannot regulate economic inactivity. As I understand it this means - in your view - the government cannot compel economic activity to take place, it can only regulate it when it occurs naturally between willing participants.
I thought about this for a while, and went back to the health care debates of the last year. One of the comments that was made, suggested that people without insurance, could always get care at the emergency room.
Why is that?
Is there some law that compels ER's to provide care to people, even though they may have no way to pay ?
